posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Web 2.0 and Education 2.0

What do you want to do?

With whom can you do it?

What tools will help you to reach your goals?

What do you want to learn?

With whom can you learn it?

What tools will help you to reach your goals?

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

“ Self-Regulated Learner

Snowman & Biehler 2006, Psychology Applied to Teaching, 11th ed., 285ff

Make space for freedom, form and ways to create students who are moved driven by their instinct thirst to learn.

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

“ I used to play video games.
— Now I make them

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

“This project was created to inspire teachers to use technology in engaging ways to help students develop higher level thinking skills. Equally important, it serves to motivate district level leaders to provide teachers with the tools and training to do so.”

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

“A short video summarizing some of the most important characteristics of students today - how they learn, what they need to learn, their goals, hopes, dreams, what their lives will be like, and what kinds of changes they will experience in their lifetime. Created by Michael Wesch in collaboration with 200 students at Kansas State University.”

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

“A showcase of two digital projects in [Clay Burrell’s] high school history (creating a wiki-based history textbook and blog) and language arts (a global wiki creative writing workshop, “The 1001 Flat World Tales”) classes.”

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Education

Education 2.0 - the art of helping students learn from each other. A few thoughts.

Kids play -> teach to program videogames or tell stories (also/especially digitally)

Kids text -> teach to make a podcast or allow them to make a school paper

Kids download consume movies and music -> help them make movies and music to upload

Kids try to take control -> you guide and they create

Popquizz: Name educational theories and theorists who would subscibe to above.

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Photo by ole @ flickr

Photo by ole @ flickr

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Web 2.0 in a nutshell

One idea begets many comments. Comments beget a network, networks beget collaborative webs.

Many ideas beget many new comments, they in turn beget new decisions and new content. This you can supply with tags to help search and find. You may collaborate in real time - or not.

Content is limited only by laws of physics. If you can digitize you can create, share, remix and redistribute. Read stuff on copyright.

Documents, music, photos, drawings, movies, programs, notation, web 2.0 … try internet search with these words and add “online”, “service” and “open source”.

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Web 1.0 vs. 2.0

Web 1.0

Static sites or homepages, Mailinglists, Bulletin and Discussion Boards, Alta Vista

Web 2.0

Blogs, Wiki’s, Webcommunities, Social Networking, Google

Have a trip down Memory Lane

KHÍ ‘96 - HÍ ‘98 - linniarfissuaq ‘00 - HiT ‘97 - UCL ‘07 - Oulu ‘97 - Lapin Ylopisto ‘03

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

Web 2.0 in terms of hyperlinked text. Before and after. From the users point of view.

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :

posted : Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

tags :